Entry
- Identify a quarterly future with positive basis (future > spot)
- Compute the annualized basis: (F/S - 1) × (365 / days_to_expiry)
- If annualized > threshold (e.g. 8%): open long spot, short future
- Match USD notional sizes
Exit
- Hold to expiry → automatic convergence to spot
- Optional: roll over into the next quarterly contract if the basis stays attractive
- Early exit when the basis converges to ~0 before expiry (profit realized)
| Name | Typ. value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| min_annualized_basis | 8-10% | Profitability threshold after fees |
| days_to_expiry | 60-90 | Shorter expiries have less yield, less risk |
| position_size_pct | 10-30% | Limit due to exchange concentration |
Pros
- Mathematically guaranteed convergence at maturity
- No active management (set-and-hold)
- Very high risk-adjusted returns historically
- Regulated venues (CME) reduce exchange risk
Cons
- Margins compressed after the ETF launch
- Capital-intensive (both legs require collateral)
- Spot delivery or payout incurs gas/fee costs
- Early liquidation risk on strong moves (when using a perp as hedge instead of a quarterly)
Core idea
A quarterly future on BTC expiring in 90 days typically costs a few percent more than spot — that is contango. The reason: long speculators want leveraged exposure, market makers are happy to sell short, but only at a premium to compensate for the capital they tie up.
Whoever reverses the trade — buy spot, sell the future — locks in this premium. At expiry the future price converges to spot with certainty (cash settlement or physical delivery) → the premium is realized.
The math
Spot price: S = $100,000
Future (90d): F = $103,000
Basis: F - S = $3,000
Annualized: ($3,000 / $100,000) × (365/90) = 12.17% APR
You earn 12.17% annualized over 90 days — with zero directional risk, because the spot long and the future short hedge each other perfectly.
Historical performance
- 2020-2022 bull phase: quarterly basis at times 20-50% annualized
- 2022 bear: basis compressed to 0, at times backwardation (negative)
- 2024 post-ETF: 15-30% back again
- Currently (April 2026): ~5%, compressed, margins eroded by ETF access
Securitize case study: combined the trade with BlackRock's BUIDL fund as collateral (earning an additional 5% T-bill yield on the spot USDC) → 20.71% total APY. That is the state of the art for institutional basis trades.
Practical implementation
Institutional (CME futures)
- Buy spot BTC (Coinbase Prime, Galaxy, etc.)
- Sell a CME BTC quarterly future (via broker access)
- Hold to expiry
- Cash-settle
Retail (Binance/OKX/Hyperliquid)
- Buy BTC spot
- Short the corresponding quarterly future (if available) or a perp (but then it's funding arb rather than basis arb)
- Hold or roll over
Risks
- Exchange risk: spot on one venue, future on another — either can fail
- Basis expansion: if the basis expands further during the trade (instead of converging), a temporary mark-to-market loss
- Funding/margin calls: futures require margin; strong moves may require topping up
- Delivery: CME futures can be physically delivered; mind the logistics
Relevance for Botty
Hyperliquid has no dated futures (perpetuals only). The direct cash-and-carry variant is therefore not implementable. For Botty, funding-rate arbitrage is the equivalent: perp short + spot long captures the same carry phenomenon, just continuously rather than at a fixed expiry. See funding_rate_arbitrage.